framing education in the context of poverty
Abstract:
This analysis is about the role of poverty in school reform.
Data from a number of sources are used to make five points. First, that
poverty in the US is greater and of longer duration than in other rich
nations. Second, that poverty, particularly among urban minorities, is
associated with academic performance that is well below international
means on a number of different international assessments. Scores of poor
students are also considerably below the scores achieved by white
middle class American students. Third, that poverty restricts the
expression of genetic talent at the lower end of the socioeconomic
scale. Among the lowest social classes environmental factors,
particularly family and neighborhood influences, not genetics, is
strongly associated with academic performance. Among middle class
students it is genetic factors, not family and neighborhood factors,
that most influences academic performance. Fourth, compared to
middle-class children, severe medical problems affect impoverished
youth. This limits their school achievement as well as their life
chances. Data on the negative effect of impoverished neighborhoods on
the youth who reside there is also presented. Fifth, and of greatest
interest, is that small reductions in family poverty lead to increases
in positive school behavior and better academic performance.
It is argued that poverty places severe limits on what can be
accomplished through school reform efforts, particularly those
associated with the federal No Child Left Behind law. The data presented
in this study suggest that the most powerful policy for improving our
nations school achievement is a reduction in family and youth
poverty. [Bold is mine]
Excerpt:
The negative income tax was studied 20 years ago and it revealed
that increases in family income resulted in increased school attendance
and better school achievement for the families that gained in income
(Salkind & Haskins, 1982). The work assistance programs of the 90s
have also been examined and again there is some evidence that as family
income went up the achievement and behavior of children in those
families improved (Huston, Duncan, Granger, Bos, McLoyd, Mistry, Crosby,
Gibson, Magnuson, Romich, & Ventura, 2001). The evidence of the
positive influence on student achievement when families are able to
leave poverty is consistent and replicable, suggesting that
inside-of-school reform needs to begin with outside-of school reform.
--
Our Impoverished View of Education Reform by
David C. Berliner
No comments:
Post a Comment